Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Bond v. USA
as 1:2014cv03306
Plaintiff:
Erving Bond
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lewis v. A-1 Bail Bonding et al
as 1:2013cv02677
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
A-1 Bail Bonding, Sherdina Lewis, Nickol Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Glaser v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 13-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. GLASER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, MITCH MORRISSEY, in his official and individual capacities, JOE MORALES, Denver Deputy District Attorney, in his official and individual capacities and others
Pinson et al v. Madison et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Erwin Villatoro
Defendant:
Richard Madison, Patricia Rangel, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dittimus v. Bond, et al
as 1:2012cv03010
Plaintiff:
Corri Dittimus
Defendant:
Bond, La Londe, Bond (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sturch, et al
as 6:2012cv00406
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Valasta Davis
Defendant:
Bill Sturch , Ken Goldman , John Kitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Belknap v. Bond et al
as 1:2011cv01519
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Belknap
Defendant:
Emily Bond and Greg Heaverlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jebe v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv01402
Petitioner:
Quinn McKenzie Jebe
Respondent:
Tom Clements and Emily Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grace-Bey v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01264
Plaintiff:
Stephen Grace-Bey
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Cheyenne Re-Entry Center, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
