Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Sweat v. Rickards, et al
as 17-2045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALREE B. SWEAT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DET. JEFF FERGUSEN, DEMING POLICE OFC. Z. ZIGMON, DET. MIKE RICKARDS and others
Dale (ID 91014) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2017cv03057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Dale
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, (fnu) Bos, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spohn (ID 54448) v. Craft et al
as 5:2017cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bryon Spohn
Defendant:
Renda Craft, (fnu) Miekle, (fnu) Barley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford (85197) v. McKinney et al
as 5:2016cv03241
Plaintiff:
Dominick James Ford
Defendant:
Casey McKinney, John/Jane Doe (1), John/Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bazzoon v. Maye et al
as 5:2016cv03151
Plaintiff:
James D. Bazzoon
Defendant:
Claude Maye, (fnu) Baker, (fnu) Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Iverson (ID 6007695) v. Bell et al
as 5:2016cv03102
Plaintiff:
Montee Ray Iverson
Defendant:
(fnu) Bell, Karen Barnt , Misty Keolavone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundgren (ID 84212) v. Green et al
as 5:2015cv03275
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sundgren
Defendant:
(fnu) Green, (fnu) Loomis , (fnu) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 15-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD A. CARY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, CDOC, REA TIMME, Warden, CTCF and others
Mc Caffrey v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv02051
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mc Caffrey
Defendant:
Warden Doe 1, Colorado Department of Corrections, Warden Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardiner (ID 46842) v. McBride et al
as 5:2015cv03151
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Gardiner
Defendant:
Bill McBride, Gene Ward, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
