Cases 41 - 50 of 205
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Martin v. Singleton et al
as 2:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Travis B. Martin and Travis Ben Martin
Defendant:
Charles Singleton, Ryan LaBounty, Colby Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gollahon v. Riley County Jail et al
as 5:2021cv03265
Plaintiff:
David Lee Gollahon
Defendant:
Riley County Jail, Dennis Butler, Derrick Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joergensen v. Schultz et al
as 1:2021cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jesper Joergensen
Defendant:
Kieth Schultz, Jane Fisher Byrialsen, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Davis County et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Angel Christopher Abreu
Defendant:
Davis County, Davis County Jail, Cole Meldrum and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Woods
as 5:2021cv03173
Petitioner:
Traveil Lyn Lewis
Respondent:
Derek Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood v. Blood
as 4:2021cv00081
Petitioner:
Lee Roy Wood
Respondent:
Devon Blood
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noonan v. Woods
as 5:2021cv03172
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Noonan
Respondent:
Derek Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Howell v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Onzo B Howell, Jr
Defendant:
Kenneth Tidwell, Dan Day, Jerry Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joergensen v. Woods et al
as 1:2021cv01893
Plaintiff:
Jesper Joergensen
Defendant:
Woods, Clerk of Costilla County Combined Courts, The, Ricky Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
