Cases 51 - 60 of 445
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others
Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Jackson Peter Chiwanga
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Schnurr, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINEO GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR, MISTI KROEKER, GERALD SHERIDAN and others
Jackson v. Ford County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Tyree Tevin Jackson
Defendant:
Ford County Detention Center and Gerald Boron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Cardenas, Bryant and Roland Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Levick et al
as 5:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dick Ray Brewer
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Cynthia Carter and Sheriff of Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson, Jr. v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Feldon J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
George Stephenson, David Martinez, Nancy Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Forslund, et al
as 23-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FORSLUND and JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
