Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Webster v. CHP Correctional Health Partners
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
CHP CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. HealthCore United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
HealthCore United States of America, 111-SeaFence HCM Resources CHP, North Side NSM and Usitalianusim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. CHP
as 1:2020cv01944
Defendant:
CHP, John Doe, Executive Director of CDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen and Edward A. Clutts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv02224
Defendant:
CHP,/PHP,INC.,, Gary Ward, Helene Christner and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Alfonzo Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Faircloth
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch, CDOC Chief Medical Doctor or Officer 'John or Jane Doe' and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, David (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoals v. CHP et al
as 1:2016cv02602
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Shoals
Defendant:
CHP, Singh and Creany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena-Olague v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01603
Plaintiff:
Jose Pena-Olague
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Michael Miller, Correctional Health Partners "CHP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadus v. DeCesaro et al
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
John Michael Broadus
Defendant:
Anthony A. DeCesaro, Chapdelain, CHP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Klenke et al
as 1:2011cv03091
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Sherman
Defendant:
Creany, Dolores Montoya, Klenke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
