Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Daniel Choate, T.D.C.J Corr. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
Gage v. Grantham et al
as 5:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Denton William Gage
Defendant:
Ryan James Grantham and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gage v. Newton et al
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
FNU Newton, Alger Flood, Jodi K Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Holland v. Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00663
Defendant:
Cody Smith, Dick White, Flint Junod and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gage v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2018cv01223
Petitioner:
Denton W Gage
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Lonnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gage v. United States Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 5:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
Denton W Gage
Defendant:
United States Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gage v. Rashidzada et al
as 5:2018cv01000
Defendant:
Sandeepkumar R Singh, James S Walker, Virginia Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Denton William Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzer v. Denton
as 6:2018cv00283
Respondent:
Robert Denton
Petitioner:
Joe Dewayne Fitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
