Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Neill v. Maag et al
as 5:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Jared Maag, Skipper Jacobs, Stephen Hunting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givis et al v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00386
Petitioner:
Kris Givis, Jeremy Newton, Andre Fuller and others
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hawkins v. Third District Court et al
as 4:2020cv00090
Respondent:
Thomas V. Lopresto, II, A. Shane Nelson, Central Utah Correctional Facility and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Dallin Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Braggs
as 4:2020cv00121
Respondent:
Jeorld Braggs
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Braggs
as 5:2020cv00153
Respondent:
Jeorld Braggs
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2019cv03730
Defendant:
Kelly, Sixkiller, Wargo and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Arriola
as 2:2019cv00583
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Dallin Hawkins
Defendant:
Brandii Arriola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Sandy City Police Department
as 2:2019cv00582
Defendant:
Sandy City Police Department
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Dallin Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Murray City Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00571
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Dallin Hawkins
Defendant:
Murray City Police Department and N. Swenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
