Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Clark v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tonda Hill, Brett Richman and Wyandotte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Torrazaz et al
as 5:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Devenion Sentell Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Torrazaz, L. Slupski, (fnu) Jolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 5:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Sean Carter Bradley
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Wyandotte County Detention Facility, (fnu) Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlobohm v. Ash et al
as 5:2023cv03014
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (3), Donald Ash, (fnu) Fewell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cahill et al
as 5:2022cv03305
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Cahill, Tonda Hill, Candice Alcaraz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Hill
as 5:2022cv03268
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
Brian C. Hall and Brian C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03260
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Chad McBride, J. Armbrister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03259
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, J. Armbrister and Brian C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Hill
as 5:2022cv03200
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Brian C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill (83060) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03108
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Hill
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
