Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOULDER COUNTY JAIL, SEAN METCALF, Badge #1469, BADGE #1418 and others
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv03099
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Boulder County Jail, Metcalf, Jarboe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf-Small v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03416
Petitioner:
Dayon Metcalf-Small and Neter Au Nuk-El
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Gordon P. Galleghar and Vince Niski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Lowery v. Leavenworth County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2021cv03125
Defendant:
Andrew D. Dedeke, (fnu) Williams, Leavenworth County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
LaJuan S.L. Lowery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf-Small v. Chairman of the Board of Parole
as 1:2020cv02292
Petitioner:
Dayon Metcalf-Small
Respondent:
Chairman of the Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Metcalf v. Duke et al
as 1:2018cv02423
Defendant:
Yanique Duke, Brad Kithcart and John Smiley
Plaintiff:
Michael Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Casad et al
as 5:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Wright
Defendant:
Ben Casad, James Colgan, (fnu) Dowd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Casad et al
as 5:2015cv03239
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Wright
Defendant:
Ben Casad, James Colgan, (fnu) Dowd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Patton
as 6:2015cv00076
Petitioner:
Dustin Metcalf
Respondent:
Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
