Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Williams-Bey v. Wichita, City of et al
as 5:2023cv03130
Petitioner:
Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey and Kirk F. Williams
Respondent:
Wichita, City of, Mark Orr, Armand L. Shukaev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore et al v. Miller et al
as 5:2021cv03001
Defendant:
Ellen Mitchell, Kaitlin Carter, Jeffery Ebel and others
Plaintiff:
James Laughlin, Jeffrey L. McLemore and Joshua Downey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nisbett v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Rick Orr, State of Oklahoma, Linda Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
James Leon Nisbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemieux v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Philip Lemieux
Defendant:
FNU Hobbs, Diann Ortega and FNU Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. C.B.M. Foods et al
as 5:2017cv03165
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr
Defendant:
C.B.M. Foods, Montgomery County Department of Corrections, Ike Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2017cv03160
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr
Defendant:
Willie Wilkinson, Jeremy Hunsucker, Rickie Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Ortega et al
as 5:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen Russell
Defendant:
Dian Ortega, FNU Hobbs, Johnny Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr et al v. Dye et al
as 5:2017cv03112
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr, Kent Johnson and Ibrahim Albureni
Defendant:
Ike Dye, Brian Leedy, C.B.M. Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2017cv03111
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr
Defendant:
Willie Wilkinson and Montgomery County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. McCollum, et al
as 17-6064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY MCCOLLUM, in individual capacity, BRUCE BORNHIEM, in individual capacity, JOE ALLBAUGH, in his official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
