Cases 91 - 100 of 479
Bailey v. Gannett Co., Inc.
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Taylor Bailey
Defendant:
Gannett Co., Inc. doing business as USA Today
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bailey v. USA
as 4:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
Melvin Louis Bailey, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Esch et al v. CarbonHelix et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morton Garrett, Carbon Helix, LLC, Jenne Marie Esch and others
Defendant:
Bankrupt Estate of Mark Precious, Bankrupt Estate of Jersey Green, Bankrupt Estate of Rick Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devillaz v. Atmosphere Gastropub, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Eric Devillaz
Defendant:
Atmosphere Gastropub, Inc., Michael Davis, Megan Davis and others
Ayers et al. v. Ascension Health Alliance
as 6:2021cv01289
Plaintiff:
Angela Ayers, Angelica Ayers, Debra Baker and others
Defendant:
Ascension Via Christi and Ascension Health Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeon v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2021cv03264
Plaintiff:
Kim McKeon
Defendant:
Bank of America, Aaran Transport, LLC, Nur Abdi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Bailey
as 21-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BAILEY
Bailey v. United States of America, The
as 2:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Nellson v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2021cv02710
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Bayer, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
