Cases 91 - 100 of 477
United States v. Graham
as 22-3001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES E. GRAHAM, JR.
Lanessa L Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lanessa L Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bowers v. Rogers, et al
as 21-3232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAHEEM BOWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL ROGERS, ROEMICH, SPELLMAN and others
Evanston Insurance Company v. Desert State Life Management, et al
as 21-2145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
DESERT STATE LIFE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, CHIRSTOPHER MOYA, in his capacity as Receiver for the receivership estate of Desert State Life Management, PAUL A. DONISTHORPE and others
Graham et al v. USA
as 1:2021cv03053
Plaintiff:
Ricky T Graham, Connie L. Archuleta and Ricky T. Graham
Defendant:
USA
Crenwelge v. Hammond et al
as 5:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Samuel Crenwelge
Defendant:
David Wayne Hammond and Kenneth J Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McGuire, et al
as 21-1320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLEEN MCGUIRE, HAROLD CLAYHURST, CATHERINE SHEA and others
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
