Cases 91 - 100 of 921
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 6:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Young v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Andrew Jorden Young
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King et al v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray King and Kelsie King
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Sara Ward, Machelle Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yankey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Desmond Yankey, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rebecca L. Blue, Wichita, City of, Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Morris v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Prentiss Morris
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Driggers v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00147
Petitioner:
Christopher Paul Driggers
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudman et al v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sierra Rudman and Calyn Boyd
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Kay Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prentice v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Prentice
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
