Cases 101 - 110 of 121
Conner v. Parsons et al
as 1:2010cv00766
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Conner
Defendant:
Mark (I) Parsons, Mark Parsons, Mark (I) Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Conner et al v. Wellstone Realty Company, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Conner and Thomas M. Conner
Defendant:
Wellstone Realty Company, LLC and Wellstone at Creekside, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carrasco et al v. Drutok et al
as 1:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
Erika Carrasco and Vivian Martinez
Defendant:
Walter Drutok and Conner Rice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Daugherty et al
as 1:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
Sirrlove Williams
Defendant:
Daugherty, Sours, Romero and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. McClary et al
as 4:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Miguel Adrian Adams
Defendant:
Glenda McClary and Dick Conners Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conner v. Combe et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charles Conner
Defendant:
Combe, Combe, Combe Labs and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cook v. Shawnee City of et al
as 5:2008cv01279
Plaintiff:
James Harrison Cook
Defendant:
Shawnee City of, Shawnee City of, Alan Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stinson v. Maynard, et al
as 08-6238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAOMI A. STINSON, as a private attorney general
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN SLABOTSKY, ALLISON MAYNARD, CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief U.S. District Judge and others
Amyx et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2008cv01123
Plaintiff:
Joan Amyx, Andromeda Augustino, Abigail Barwick and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Cingular Wireless LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
