Cases 101 - 110 of 218
Gutteridge v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-6321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD JOE GUTTERIDGE, JR., as limited guardian of D.C., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of Oklahoma, CAROLYN FUNK and others
Carr et al v. Remington Arms Company LLC
as 5:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Ryan Carr and Jessica Carr
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cummings et al v. Bussey et al
as 1:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
Randy Cummings , Cruz Gallegos , Robert J. Garcia and others
Defendant:
Celina Bussey and Jason Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacific Western Bank v. Tri-State Imaging Partners et al
as 2:2016cv00850
Plaintiff:
Pacific Western Bank
Defendant:
Tri-State Imaging Partners, Tri-State Imaging PA Holdings, Jay S. Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Brigham Young University et al
as 1:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
Larry Carr
Defendant:
Brigham Young University, Western Athletic Conference and National Collegiate Athletic Association, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr et al v. Martinez et al
as 1:2016cv01705
Plaintiff:
kerman-ray carr and priscilla carr
Defendant:
Alex J. Martinez, Stephanie O'Malley, Robert White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann Carr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carr v. Thomas et al
as 5:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
James Carr
Defendant:
Christina Thomas and Mars Gonzaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Carla Lee Carr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tina Lavon Carr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
