Cases 111 - 120 of 1,061
United States v. Sanchez
as 23-3023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMIAS SANCHEZ
United States v. Sanchez
as 23-3024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMIAS SANCHEZ
DeGroat v. Cordero et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joy Evelyn DeGroat
Defendant:
Marcos Cordero, Brian Sanchez, Corey Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. McGrath, et al
as 22-1447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERIDETH MCGRATH, MATTHEW WINDEN, HODGES and others
Sanchez v. Snap Finance et al
as 2:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez
Defendant:
Snap Finance and Snap RTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Waltrip et al v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00642
Plaintiff:
Juston Waltrip, Jonathan Winckler, Sergio Olivas and others
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC and Pilot Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cruz et al v. City of Deming et al
as 2:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ernestina Cruz and G.R.V.
Defendant:
City of Deming, Lee Cook Jordan, Sergio Quezada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Markwardt v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2022cv02945
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MARKWARDT
Defendant:
SHERIFF TONY SPURLOCK, MORGAN STANTON, COURTNEY ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 - Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
