Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Davidson v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 1:2020cv03851
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs Department, Aramark Food Service and L. Sayers
Plaintiff:
Cody Evans Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv01351
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Reardon and Williams
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Cline et al
as 5:2019cv03003
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Sherri Price, Tyler Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Dona Ana County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burke
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Detention Center, Enrique Vigil, Ken Miyagishima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Aramark Food Services
as 1:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
Richard Darling
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Correct Care Solutions and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Aramark Uniform Services et al
as 6:2014cv01254
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garcia
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform Services II, Inc. , Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC , Aramark Business & Industry, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox v. Aramark Food Service, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02406
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, LLC , fnu Hightower and fnu Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Guy v. Solis, et al
as 13-2008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD GUY
Defendant - Appellee:
NM SEC. OF CORRECTIONS ALFONSO SOLIS, GREG MARCANTEL, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cox v. Denning et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Frank Denning , Aramark Food Services , Derrick (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
