Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00634
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Pivnichny et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 5:2015cv00530
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Timothy Pivnichny, Barack Obama, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00745
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith, et al v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, et al
as 13-4027
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: STEVEN B. SMITH and JANA D. SMITH
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, AKA Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a National Association
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00027
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Smith v. Kansas, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv03191
Plaintiff: Thomas B. Smith
Defendant: Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Steven B. Smith
as 12-805
Attorney: In re: STEVEN B. SMITH
Smith et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00430
Plaintiff: Steven B. Smith and Jana D. Smith
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Servicing and ReconTrust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3062
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JONEARL B. SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?