Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Respondent: HANNA OIL & GAS COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ENERVEST OPERATING, LLC and others
Petitioner: DIANE REECE, WILLIAM REECE, SUSAN HOLMES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Miller International, Inc. v. Sidran, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00387
Plaintiff: Miller International, Inc.
Defendant: Sidran, Inc. and Trevor Brazile
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00084
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Reece et al v. AES Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00457
Defendant: Star Bulk, MMHF, LLC, SEECO, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Bill Reece, Bennett Tanksley, Charles Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Summers v. Texas De Brazil (Denver) Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01258
Plaintiff: Stacy Summers
Defendant: Texas De Brazil (Denver) Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00401
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kansas Judicial Watch, et al v. Mike Stout, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant: KANSAS JUDICIAL WATCH, CHARLES M. HART and ROBB RUMSEY
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, JENNIFER L. JONES, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, NANCY ANSTAETT, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and others
Yost v. Stout, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3099
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERICK R. YOST
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, JENNIFER L. JONES, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, NANCY ANSTAETT, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and others
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson and OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee: CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC. and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant: TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant: RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE and others
Third-Party-Defendant: JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant: CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor: ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?