Cases 11 - 20 of 1,902
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roger John Donald Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garner v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Donald Garner
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Traditions Health, LLC v. Huffman et al
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Traditions Health, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Huffman, Sharon Reed, Kaycee Funk and others
West v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), (fnu) Carter, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Estrada et al v. Charles et al
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Estrada, Carol Estrada, Patricia Garcia and others
Defendant:
Champney Gregory Charles, Las Animas, City of and Bent County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estrada et al v. Champney et al
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Estrada, Carol Estrada, Patricia Garcia and others
Defendant:
Charles Gregory Champney, City of Las Animas, The, County of Bent County, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchings v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Hutchings, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jaramillo v. North Restaurants LLC
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Jaramillo, Donald Zahnd, Deisha Dabdoub and others
Defendant:
North Restaurants LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
