Cases 11 - 20 of 203
Youngers et al v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Joleen K. Youngers and Sara Crecca
Defendant:
Vickie Hobbs and Tony Bustos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barela v. City of Hobbs, et al
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT BARELA, by his next friend, Cyndi Barela
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITY OF HOBBS, JOHN JOSEPH ORTOLANO, BRANDON MARINOVICH and others
Shorter v. Carter, et al
as 23-2096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA MICHELLE SHORTER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON CARTER, CITY OF HOBBS and HOBBS MUNICIPAL COURT
Waters et al v. City of Altus, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Bradley Waters and Bryan Waters
Defendant:
City of Altus, Oklahoma, Does ## 1-5, Roger Levick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
James Hobbs and Cathy Hobbs
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burkhalter v. Gray et al
as 4:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Marquise Burkhalter
Defendant:
Kevin Gray, Grace Hobbs, Adam J Derycke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
April Dawn Hobbs
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ricketts v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Edward Lorenzo Ricketts
Defendant:
William Hobbs, D/O Myrko and D/O Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barela v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Albert Barela
Defendant:
City of Hobbs, John Joseph Ortolano, Brandon Marinovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
