Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Thomas v. Olson et al
as 1:2016cv00696
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Olivett, Travis Trani, Internal Classification Committee Chairman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch, Office of the Inspector General Colorado Department of Corrections, Richard Wren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guglielmi v. Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General
as 1:2012cv00442
Movant:
Ralph Guglielmi
Objector:
Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Pinnacle Physician Resource Group, Ltd. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General et al
as 1:2011cv00805
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Physician Resource Group, Ltd.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General and DaVita Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 304
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claice v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
John A. Claice
Defendant:
Susan Jones, Williams, Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Department of Agriculture, Inspector General of v. Bigelow Associated Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02057
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Agriculture, Inspector General of
Defendant:
Bigelow Associated Farms, Inc., JB Farms, LLC and Ken Burback
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grady et al v. Ritter et al
as 1:2007cv00749
Plaintiff:
Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant:
Bill Ritter, Colorado Department of Personnel, Ed Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
