Cases 11 - 20 of 312
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Kansas Turnpike Authority v. Porter
as 6:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Kansas Turnpike Authority
Defendant:
Kimberly Porter and Kimberly Anne Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Curry v. Prowers County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Channing Curry
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, Prowers County, Joshua Vogel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wieber v. Porter, et al
as 23-1158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE DEAN WIEBER
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW PORTER, DANIEL HYDE, JAMES L. BARRON and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
FoFana v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Linda J. FoFana
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Department of Transportation, The, Department of Housing, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
