Cases 11 - 20 of 571
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhoades v. Bowling et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rhoades and Dusty Rhoades
Defendant:
Bret Bowling, Creek County Board of County Commissioners, Steven Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasscock v. Kelsey et al
as 4:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Steven Glasscock
Defendant:
Jason Kelsey and USPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01089
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Steven DeWayne Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zodoq-El v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01088
Petitioner:
Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Stevens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Wraspir v. Custer County Jail
as 5:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tyler Wraspir
Defendant:
Custer County Jail, Dan Day, Dean Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
