Cases 11 - 20 of 378
Tolliver (PS) et al v. Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01260
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver and Danny Tolliver
Defendant:
Human Services, LAX Airport Employees, Angela Simmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Priest et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Priest, Victim Witness, Chruch Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Yvette Bailey, Cardi B, Marnelis Almanzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver v. State Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
State Human Services, Keisha Knight, Jhon Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Walmart Supermart Market et al
as 1:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Walmart Supermart Market, Miley Cyrus, Dough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver v. Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile, Kim Kardashian West, Kylie Jenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
United States v. Simmons
as 24-6077
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BOBBY DALE SIMMONS
Simmons v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00425
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Bobby Dale Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3030
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES ROBERTSON
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ and others
Simmons v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Glynn Simmons
Defendant:
Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
