Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Pontious v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 22-6073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN A. PONTIOUS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Riordan v. U.S. Marine Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
J Tyrone Riordan
Respondent:
U.S. Marine Corp., U.S. Navy, U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Pontious
as 22-6032
Petitioner:
GLEN A, PONTIOUS
Respondent:
JAMES E. TRAINOR, III, WILLIAM BARR, NANCY PELOSI and others
Sharp v. US. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Tommy Sharp
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and William Bar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01755
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michels v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
John J. Michels
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Podlucky v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv00646
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Podlucky
Defendant:
USA and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 5:2020cv04068
Plaintiff:
Terrell R. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
