Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Hicks v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2017cv03001
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Hicks
Defendant:
Wendy Gallegos, Wendy (I) Gallegos, Jerome Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Alderton et al
as 1:2017cv02896
Plaintiff:
Jada Davis
Defendant:
William (I) Peat Alderton, William Peat Alderton, Chaffee County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Compton v. Raemich et al.
as 1:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
Jason Greggory Compton
Defendant:
Rick Raemich, Kelly Wasko, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv02283
Plaintiff:
Matt Compton and Shawna Compton
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lujan v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Monica Lujan
Defendant:
Monica Wetzel , Dolly Jaramillo , John Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Singleton v. Compton, et al
as 16-1257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL HEINZ SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY COMPTON, CDOC Time Computation, JOHN/JANE DOE, CDOC Accounting and Dispersal, JOHN/JANE DOE, Administration and others
East Binger, et al v. Stephenson, et al
as 16-601
Petitioner:
BINGER OPERATIONS LLC, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, formerly known as Phillips Petroleum Company, EAST BINGER (MARCHAND) UNIT and others
Respondent:
LYNDA COMPTON, wife, for themselves and all others similarly situated, BILLY STEPHENSON, husband, for themselves and all others similarly situated, CHERYL STEPHENSON, wife, for themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Compton v. Standard Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00687
Plaintiff:
Leotis Compton
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
