Cases 11 - 20 of 297
Quinn v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Ronald Quinn
Defendant:
Joshua Davis and Cory Horalek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03221
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Daniel L. Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03222
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Daniel L. Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lamb (ID 128322) v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Lamb
Defendant:
Laura Kelly, David McCabe, Megan Davis and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Steele v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, D. Hudson, (fnu) Grecco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Jamie Davis
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Davis (ID 06598) v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv03124
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kris W. Kobach and Daniel L. Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Kobach et al
as 5:2023cv03120
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kris W. Kobach and Daniel L. Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
Kris W. Kobach and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
