Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 327
Moreno, et al v. Zimmerman
as 21-8066
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINCENT S. MORENO and JEANIE R. MORENO
Defendant / Appellee: EDWARD DOYLE ZIMMERMAN, M.D.
Brunson v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff: Raland J. Brunson
Defendant: Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Young v. United States Dept of Justice
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant: United States Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6079
Plaintiff / Appellant: HERMAN TRACY CLARK
Defendant / Appellee: OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, TOM BATES, Executive Director, C. ALLEN MCCALL, J.D. Member and others
Sparks v. Lea County Detention Center et al
as 2:2021cv00603
Defendant: John and Jane Does, Lea County, Nor-Lea Hospital District and others
Plaintiff: Doyle Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01755
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01711
Respondent: Department of Justice
Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01517
Defendant: Dept of Justice, US Attorney General and USA
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2021cv01452
Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent: Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Simmons et al v. Ganley et al
as 6:2021cv01130
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Simmons and Catherine Simmons
Defendant: Darnell B. Ganley, Elizabeth A. Doyle and Joshua A. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?