Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Brown v. Fallin, et al
as 16-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLOMAN CORNELIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY FALLIN, Governor, THOMAS ALFORD, Judge, JOHN HANEY, Mayor of Muskogee and Police Department Executive and others
Alford v. Social Security Disability Insurance
as 1:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Bedford Alford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Fowlin et al
as 6:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Willoman C. Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Mary Fowlin, Thomas Alford, Emily LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chambers v. Mack Alford Correctional Center et al
as 5:2015cv01338
Plaintiff:
Onie Chambers
Defendant:
Mack Alford Correctional Center, Dean McGee Eye Institution and FNU HouseHair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilyard v. Chrisman
as 15-6227
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E.D. GILYARD
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY CHRISMAN, Warden, Mack Alford Correctional Center
Womble v. Parker, et al
as 15-7066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH Z. WOMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, Deputy Director, ROBERT PATTON and MARY FALLIN, Governor of State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
JERRY CHRISMAN, Warden, TOMMY SHARP, Deputy Warden, Mack Alford Correctional Center and DONNA VITOSKI, Food Service Manager
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Permanent Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Defendant:
100 Foot Wide Permanent Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines, United States of America , Georgia Anne Pohocsucut Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
