Cases 21 - 30 of 55
McKern v. Zorn et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Stacey McKern
Defendant:
Christine Zorn and Christine Arguello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, et al v. Los Lunas Community Program, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER STEPHEN JACKSON, by his parents and next friends, Walter and Helen Jackson, STEVE NUNEZ, by his guardian and next friend, Mary Kathryn Reed, RON FULLER, by his mother and next friend, Josephine Boughton and others
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
JOHN E. YOUNG, IRIS YOUNG, legal guardians and paren of Rita Kay Young, DORA L. ROMERO and others
Arguello v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02392
Plaintiff:
Jesse Arguello
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arguello Hope & Associates PLLC v. Penn Grand Limited et al
as 5:2015cv00998
Plaintiff:
Arguello Hope & Associates PLLC
Defendant:
Penn Grand Limited , W Ray Pelfrey and Rosemarie Pelfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banks v. Katzenmeyer, et al
as 15-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORREY V. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN KATZENMEYER, STEPHANIE ENGLAR, FCF Mental Helath Counselor, JERRI SCOLLARD, Acting FCF Mental Health Supervisor and others
Moore v. Arguello, et al
as 14-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR JAMES MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPT. ARGUELLO and CAPT. TOM MEEK
Arguello v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2014cv01602
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Arguello
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Arguello, et al
as 14-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARGUELLO, Capt. and TOM MEEK, Capt.
Jiron v. Krieger et al
as 1:2014mc00055
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
Marcia S. Krieger, Wiley Y. Daniel, Christine M. Arguello and others
Moore v. Arguello, et al
as 14-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR J. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARGUELLO and TOM MEEK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
