Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Gomez et al v. Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
as 2:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez Gomez, Adrian Margarito Lopez-Arenas, Alfonso Navaez-Uscanga and others
Defendant:
Epic Landscape Productions, Inc., Epic Landscape Prductions and Epic Landscape Productions, L.C.
Rackauckas v. SafeMoon US et al
as 2:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rackauckas
Defendant:
SafeMoon US, SafeMoon Connect, Tano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Cortez-Lazcano v. Whitten
as 22-5031
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL CORTEZ-LAZCANO
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK WHITTEN
Clervrain et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Fabrice Thomas and others
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Howie Morales, Alicia J Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rothschild v. Cortez
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Rothschild
Defendant:
Jose A. Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Zade et al
as 1:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Eugene Owens and Nathanael Owens
Defendant:
Misty Zade, Siobhan Burtlow, Mellisa Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandy v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv00413
Defendant:
Jane E. Brooks, Jane (I) E. Brooks, State of Colorado, The and others
Plaintiff:
Bayardo Reno Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Cortez-Diaz
as 21-3216
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN MANUEL CORTEZ-DIAZ
Marquez-Cortez, et al v. Garland
as 21-9581
Petitioner:
ELZI NOEMI MARQUEZ-CORTEZ and A.V.M.
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
