Cases 21 - 30 of 184
Kemp v. Mauldin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kemp and Bobby M. Kemp
Defendant:
Mauldin Corporation et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Shaw et al v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Shaw and All inmates at the Curry County Detention Center et al.
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Curry County Adult Detention Center and FNU Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolak v. Arapahoe County, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAPAHOE COUNTY, ET AL., ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF, S FACILITY, ET AL., HEALTH AND SAFETY OF AMERICA, ET AL. and others
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Wyant v. Midland Mortgage
as 1:2021cv03460
Plaintiff:
Terry L Wyant
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage and Midland Mortgage, et al
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00708
Defendant:
Jane Doe, The New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners and The National Conference of Bar Examiners, et al.
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
