Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Bange v. Marques et al
as 6:2011cv01375
Plaintiff:
Edward-William Bange
Claimant:
Russell-Jay Gould Marques
Defendant:
Paul D. Post, United States Bankruptcy Court of Kansas and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riches v. WNBA, et al
as 09-1354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, DBA Bernard Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
WNBA, DBA Women's National Basketball Association, LOS ANGELES SPARKS, CANDACE PARKER and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Market Street Advisors et al
as 1:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Market Street Advisors, Shawn R. Merriman, LLC-1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv01084
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marques Martin, Federal Correctional Complex Low and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara et al
as 6:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Margaret D Edwards-Flynn
Defendant:
Cheryl Ann Yara, Matthew Sandoval, Henry O. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Marques-Gober
as 2:2007cv00119
Petitioner:
Benjamin Shawn Marques-Gober
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simpson, et al v. University CO Bldr
as 1:2002cv02390
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Lisa Simpson and Anne Gilmore
Defendant:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Intervenor:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Denver Publishing Company, Marques Harris and Colt Brennan
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
