Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Thompson v. Parker
as 4:2023cv00079
Petitioner: Maurice L Thompson
Respondent: David Parker and Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Pollock Federal Institution
as 5:2023cv00301
Plaintiff: Maurice Morlee Johnson
Defendant: Pollock Federal Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Barnes
as 23-3031
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MAURICE LASHAWN BARNES
Barclay v. Choate
as 1:2022cv03323
Petitioner: Maurice Lamar Barclay
Respondent: J. Choate and Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Teague v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00362
Plaintiff: Maurice D. Teague
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harris v. Sandoval
as 23-1017
Petitioner / Appellant: MAURICE E. HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee: STEPHANIE SANDOVAL, Warden, CSP
United States v. Farris
as 22-1412
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MAURICE FARRIS
Ford v. Forde et al
as 1:2022cv02682
Plaintiff: Brandon Maurice Ford
Defendant: Brian Forde, Elias Diggins, Denver Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01086
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant: Joe Biden, Lynn Rogers, Jennifer Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2022cv01719
Petitioner: Maurice E. Harris
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Defendant: Dean Williams and Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?