Cases 21 - 30 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Young (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carcamo-Perez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9512
Petitioner:
KAREN PATRICIA CARCAMO-PEREZ, JOSUE AREVALO-CARCAMO and EMELY AREVALO-CARCAMO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421 Aliens and Nationality
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller-Albarez v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Krystle Xylina Miller-Albarez
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Joe Biden, Michelle Lujan Grisham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
