Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Mackenzie v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00455
Plaintiff:
Francis Mackenzie
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Auer et al. v. Schmid et al.
as 1:2013cv00391
Petitioner:
Franz Auer , Joanna Goldsmith and Marian Lewis
Respondent:
Kristen Schmid
Interested_party:
Poseiden Concepts Corp., A. Scott Dawson, Matt MacKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Assistance to foreign & international tribunals & litigants
Cowboys for Life et al v. Sampson et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cowboys for Life , Jennifer M Ortman and Joshua R Bowman
Defendant:
Brian K Sampson, Lee Bird, Burns Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00891
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02773
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Eyres v. MacKenzie et al
as 2:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
Todd A. Eyres
Defendant:
John William MacKenzie and Wilbur-Ellis Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Rodney R Williams
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, J Dupler, M Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States v. Hunter; Antrobus, et al
as 08-4010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MACKENZIE HUNTER
Movant - Appellant:
SUE ANTROBUS and KEN ANTROBUS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
