Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Combs v. Progressive Transportation Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Patricia Combs
Defendant:
Progressive Transportation Inc and Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Oliver
as 1:2014cv00332
Petitioner:
Marcus Robert Williams
Respondent:
John Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Long v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2013cv01445
Plaintiff:
Robert William Long
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Wilcox
as 13-6160
Petitioner:
In re: PAMELA JEAN WILCOX, MARVIN LEE WILCOX, Appellant and ROBERT WILLIAM MATHEWS
Respondent:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES and DOUGLAS LYNN JACKSONN
Oshkosh McNeilus Financial Services Partnership v. ATM Industries Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01211
Plaintiff:
Oshkosh McNeilus Financial Services Partnership
Defendant:
ATM Industries Inc, Michael McDaniel , Walter Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levin v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2011cv00517
Plaintiff:
Sean Joseph Levin
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Lupe Martinez-Marshall, Anthony Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Richards et al
as 5:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Rodney Richards, Randy Johnson and Bob Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Jefferson County Combined Court et al
as 1:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
Robert William Hill
Defendant:
Jefferson County Combined Court, Dennis James Hall, State of Colorado Alternate Defense Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00185
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.