Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Brueningsen, et al v. Resort Express, et al
as 16-4198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRUENINGSEN, ALDIS BARSKETIS, STEVE SIMCHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RESORT EXPRESS, INC., PARK CITY TRANSPORTATION, INC. and PREMIER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Vivint v. Sorensen
as 2:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
Vivint
Defendant:
Devin Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Sorensen v. USA
as 2:2016cv00639
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Sorensen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America et al v. St. Mark's Hospital et al
as 2:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Gerald Polukoff
Defendant:
St Mark's Hospital , Intermountain Healthcare, Inc , Sherman Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Senecal v. Kanab City et al
as 2:2015cv00771
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Senecal
Defendant:
Kanab City, Nina Laycook, James G. Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brueningsen, et al v. Resort Express, et al
as 15-4021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BRUENINGSEN, ALDIS BARSKETIS, STEVE SIMICHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RESORT EXPRESS, INC., PARK CITY TRANSPORTATION, INC. and PREMIER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Ordonez v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mario Ordonez
Defendant:
Dennis Sorensen, John Irons, Mel Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2014cv00918
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Gile T. Sorensen, Jr. , Wal-Mart Stores and Wal-Mart Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Sorensen
as 14-1366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEROLD R. SORENSEN
Miller et al v. McCloud et al
as 1:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Miller , Terance M. Maher , Max H. Owen and others
Defendant:
Harold S. McCloud , Debra A. McCloud and Thomas J. Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
