Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Felvey v. Colorado Springs Police Dept.
as 1:2016cv02526
Plaintiff:
Katherine Stewart Felvey
Defendant:
John Suthers, Jeff Shanna and Sean Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Ardery et al
as 5:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ray Ardery, Shanna Ardery, Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robinson et al v. Porter et al
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dan Robinson , Jill Robinson , Andrew Adamson and others
Defendant:
Stacey Porter, Porter Building Systems, Robert S. West Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
United States of America v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Connie R Mitchell, Clifton C Cohn, Shanna M Cohn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2013cv03002
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Allen
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Rae Timme, Fredric Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2013cv01500
Plaintiff:
Monte Cantu
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Rae Timme, Justin McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Conlee v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Shanna R. Conlee
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
