Cases 31 - 40 of 1,459
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv02272
Defendant:
Vectrus Systems LLC and Ronald Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)(2)-(o)(t) - Job Discrimination (Other)
v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv02273
Defendant:
Vectrus Systems LLC and Ronald Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Doe 1 et al v. Juvenile Bureau of Tulsa County District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Parent Doe 10, Parent Doe 1, Parent Doe 13 and others
Defendant:
Dquan Doyle, Juvenile Bureau of Tulsa County District Court, Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuciapinski v. Ennis et al
as 1:2024cv02181
Defendant:
Nicolas A. Budenz, Kelly Mayo, Dana Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Mykhael Kuciapinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Makris Law Firm, PC et al
as 1:2024cv02146
Defendant:
Law Offices of Christopher Bradshaw-Hull and Makris Law Firm, PC
Plaintiff:
Wilber Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States v. Harris
as 24-8050
Defendant:
DUSTY RONALD HARRIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harris (PS) et al v. Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Malik Shakur Harris, Najee Hoffman, Nazeem Shabazz and others
Defendant:
Aurora Fire Department, Falck Rocky Mountain and Aurora Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 wd - Fed.Question: Wrongful Death
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
