Cases 31 - 40 of 835
Konecny (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
Kimberly C Priest Johnson, Christine A Nowak, Sean D. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ion Solar, LLC et al v. Maya et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ion Solar, LLC and Solar Sales, LLC
Defendant:
Jordan Maya, Brandon Seidel, Noah Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al
as 5:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Jordan Bell, Daniel Schnurr, Joel Hrabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Hannah Feldhacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delane Williams
Defendant:
Jordan Blake Jones, Jace Gilly, Marcus Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Poe v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Poe
Defendant:
State of Utah, USCF, CUCF and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 23-5133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA and CHARLES W. JORDAN, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police, Tulsa Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
