Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Waterman v. Tippie, et al
as 22-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE TIPPIE, THOMAS DEGROOT, APRIL MCAFEE and others
Waterman v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas, et al
as 22-3052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS, CURTIS NIDA, Sergeant, in his individual capacity, NATHAN DAVIS, Jailer, in his individual capacity and others
Waterman v. Groves, et al
as 22-3042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID M. GROVES, MICHELLE TIPPIE, DANNY DAVIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Spencer Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turlington v. Connor, et al
as 22-5001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN HARDEE TURLINGTON, II
Defendant / Appellee:
WINSTON H. CONNOR, II, STOCKWELL & CONNOR, PLLC, DELAWARE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA and others
Waterman v. Degroot, et al
as 21-3234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS DEGROOT, MICHELLE TIPPIE, DAVID M. GROVES and others
Waterman v. Groves, et al
as 21-3199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID M. GROVES and MICHELLE TIPPIE
Shipps v. Groves
as 5:2021cv03223
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Shipps
Defendant:
David Groves, Advance Correctional Healthcare, Michelle Tippie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waterman v. Groves et al
as 5:2021cv03206
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Defendant:
David M. Groves and Michelle Tippie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
