Cases 31 - 40 of 8,840
Chukwurah v. Harding
as 24-6108
Petitioner:
DAVID BRYAN EMEKA CHUKWURAH
Respondent:
RANDY HARDING, Warden
Meyer et al v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Eric Meyer and Hoch Publishing Co., Inc., The doing business as Marion County Record
Defendant:
Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Oney et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Justin B. Oney and Yolanda M. Oney
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, David Rivas, Danielle M. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lucero et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lucero, Antonio Martinez, Antonio E. Cavasos and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbarker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosgray v. Eddy County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
David W. Cosgray
Defendant:
Eddy County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nidiffer, et al v. Lovato, et al
as 24-2056
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NIDIFFER and LAURIE-LYNN FRANCESE
Defendant:
DAVID LOVATO, Officer, ARMANDO CAMPOS, Officer and ZACHARY SISEMORE, Officer
Herbel et al v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Ruth Herbel and Ronald Herbel
Defendant:
Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
