Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Winchester v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00307
Petitioner:
Kevin Dewayne Winchester
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Mullin et al
as 5:2010cv00263
Petitioner:
Mills Evon Smith
Respondent:
Mike Mullin and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Parker, et al
as 5:2010cv00252
Petitioner:
Robert Claude McCormick
Respondent:
Randy Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00220
Petitioner:
Orlando Wilson
Respondent:
David Parker, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Keffer et al
as 4:2010cv00113
Petitioner:
John Fitzgerald Hanson
Respondent:
Joe Keffer and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Green v. Rudek et al
as 5:2010cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Green
Respondent:
James Rudek and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 5:2010cv00110
Petitioner:
Jerry L Thomas
Respondent:
David C Miller and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
