Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Hawk v. Moisant
as 1:2020cv02579
Defendant:
Tim Moisant
Plaintiff:
Basil Loud Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Sawyer, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
J.E. KRUEGER, Regional Director, North Central Regional Office F.B.O.P., BRAD GRELICK, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Englewood, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Interim Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH F. BOWMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01740
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Chevarria et al v. Ameristar Casino Black Hawk, LLC
as 1:2020cv01129
Plaintiff:
John Chevarria and Kelley Chevarria
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino Black Hawk, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godfrey v. Norwood, et al
as 19-3231
Defendant / Appellee:
(FNU) KRAMMER, Mental Health Staff, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, (FNU) SLATON, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, GERALD JORGENSON, Regional Director of Operations, Corizon Health Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE D. GODFREY
Jorgensen, et al v. Oklahoma Office of Juv Affairs, et al
as 19-6145
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELE MOORE, ROBERT HENDRYX, DOE ENTITIES and others
Defendant:
SAC AND FOX JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE JORGENSEN and AAGE JORGENSEN
Crews v. Hawk Sawyer et al
as 2:2019cv02541
Defendant:
Deborah G. Schult and Kathleen Hawk Sawyer
Plaintiff:
Leaman Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
