Cases 31 - 40 of 151
Ali v. Lambert, et al
as 20-5084
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS LAMBERT, Det. Officer, Tulsa County Jail and GARY KAISER, Sgt., Tulsa County Jail
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MURTAZA ALI
Peel et al v. Hamilton Materials et al
as 2:2020cv00629
Defendant:
Murco Wall Products, Sherwin Williams, Kaiser Gypsum and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa S. Peel and Thomas E. Sudweeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington Options
as 2:2020cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bradley K.
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington Options
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MRC Permian Company v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
as 2:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
MRC Permian Company
Defendant:
Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pauper Petroleum, LLC v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
as 4:2019cv00514
Defendant:
Kaiser-Francis Oil Company
Plaintiff:
Pauper Petroleum, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Parkview Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01862
Defendant:
Andrea B. Kaiser, James A. Conrad and Parkview Medical Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Walker v. Kaiser Permanente
as 1:2019cv00476
Plaintiff:
Sharon Walker
Defendant:
Kaiser Permanente, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 105
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bowers v. Barrier Compliance Services LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Bowers
Defendant:
Kirk A. Kaiser and Barrier Compliance Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Kaiser v. AT&T Government
as 4:2019cv00035
Defendant:
AT&T Government
Plaintiff:
Williams Matthew Kaiser and William Matthew Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
