Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Fagan (ID 36312) v. Conover
as 5:2013cv03061
Petitioner:
Michael R. Fagan
Respondent:
Emmalee Conover and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beadles v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv03127
Petitioner:
Tramaine Beadles
Respondent:
United States of America and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans (ID 67355) v. McKune et al
as 5:2012cv03103
Petitioner:
Delarick Evans
Respondent:
David R. McKune, Kansas Attorney General and Appellate Courts of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Landrith v. Kansas Attorney General et al
as 2:2012cv02161
Plaintiff:
Bret D. Landrith
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General , Don Jordan, Rob Siedlecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2011cv04187
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Miles
Defendant:
State of Kansas , William Peterson and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crowther v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2011cv03202
Petitioner:
David Crowther
Respondent:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strope v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2011cv03196
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Strope
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, United States Congress, (fnu) Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trumbly v. Heimgardner et al
as 5:2011cv03185
Petitioner:
Mikel E. Trumbly
Respondent:
James Heimgardner, Kansas Parole Board and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Metcalfe v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2011cv03148
Petitioner:
Hercules C. Metcalfe
Respondent:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
