Cases 31 - 40 of 43
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Henderson et al
as 5:2012cv03051
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Henderson, Sheldon Stewart, Larry Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Epsilon Data Management, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00888
Plaintiff:
Olga Sally McMahon
Defendant:
Epsilon Data Management, LLC and Alliance Data Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gadd v. Schwartzkopf, et al
as 09-8100
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. GADD
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA A. SCHWARTZKOPF, DONNA NICHOLS, JAMES A. EDDINGTON and others
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
MARIE M. MCMAHON
O'Neil v. McMahon
as 1:2009cv01270
Plaintiff:
Kendra W. O'Neil
Defendant:
Michelle McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Astrue
as 08-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA S. MCMAHON, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marshall v. McMahon
as 1:2007cv00331
Plaintiff:
Roger Marshall
Defendant:
Linda S. McMahon and Linda S. McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hawthorne v. McMahon
as 1:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Reginald W. Hawthorne
Defendant:
Linda S. McMahon and Linda S. McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
