Cases 31 - 40 of 389
Kyte v. State of Oregon
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Harris et al v. Avocademy Inc
as 5:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Megan Harris
Defendant:
Avocademy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Tarrell Hughes
Defendant:
Megan Smith, Andy LNU, US Marshalls Agent # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henard v. County of Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, Jeff Shradder, R. Marinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyte v. Denver Health
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
Denver Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyte v. Denver Health
as 23-1199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DENVER HEALTH
Kyte v. State of Oregon
as 1:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Roland Keith Bates
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Red Rock Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westenbroek et al v Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, Jane Doe III and others
Defendant:
Kappa Kappa Gamm Fraternity, Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity Council President, Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Auguiste v. Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater County et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Lex Auguiste
Defendant:
Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater County and Megan Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
